ПАРАДОКС И ОСОБЕННОСТИ ЕГО ПЕРЕВОДА НА РУССКИЙ ЯЗЫК НА МАТЕРИАЛЕ ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЙ ОСКАРА УАЙЛЬДА

CHAPTER 1. THE LINGUISTIC NATURE OF THE PARADOX 5
1.1 The paradox notion from the point of view of linguistics and philology5
1.2 The paradox notion from the point of view of literature 13
1.3 Types and classification of the paradox 31
1.4 Summary of Results 35
CHAPTER 2. PARADOX AS A LITERARY CONCEPT OF O. WILDE 37
2.1 Features of the translation of the paradox in the "Portrait of Dorian Gray" by O. Wilde 37
2.2 Analysis of the nature of the paradox in the “Picture of Dorian Gray” 51
2.3 Results and discussion 59
CHAPTER 3. PRACTICAL RELEVANCE OF THE OBTAINED RESULTS 61
3.1 Application of the research results in the field of literature 61
3.2 Application of the research results in the field of translation studies 62
3.3 Application of the research results in the field of linguistic and cultural studies 68
3.4 Results and Recommendations 70
CONCLUSION 73
REFERENCES 75
APPENDIX 81

Весь текст будет доступен после покупки

A paradox is a statement or situation that seems contradictory or absurd, but is actually true or reliable. In literature, a paradox is often used to create tension, emphasize a topic, or challenge the reader's assumptions. It can be expressed through language, character, plot, or images and is often used to convey complex or ambiguous ideas. Paradox can also be used to create irony or humor, and it is a common element in literary genres such as satire and allegory.
Oscar Wilde was an Irish writer who was known for his wit, humor and use of paradoxes in his works. A paradox is a statement that seems to contradict itself or goes against common sense, but upon closer examination reveals a deeper truth.
Wilde often used paradoxes in his plays, novels, and essays to challenge conventional wisdom and encourage readers to think critically. He believed that paradoxes were a way to express the complexity and inconsistency of human
In general, Wilde's use of paradoxes in his writings was a way to challenge conventional thinking and explore the complexities of human nature. His wit and humor made his paradoxes interesting and thought provoking, and his writing legacy continues to inspire readers today.

Весь текст будет доступен после покупки

CHAPTER 1
THE LINGUISTIC NATURE OF THE PARADOX
1.1 The paradox notion from the point of view of linguistic and philology
This part of the work is devoted to various concepts of the paradox in different fields: linguistic, philosophy, stylistics, literature, some adjacent areas. The work shows that the formation of paradoxical meaning in the lyric texts of modern literature is often achieved with the help of such stylistic means as an oxymoron, antithesis, antonyms, zeugma, and negation. Particular attention is paid to the linguistic analysis of structural schemes of oxymoronic combination arranged in descending order. By modern poets, the paradox is used to enhance imagery, in order to draw the reader’s attention to communicatively significant information, to give the statement more expressiveness, aphorism. The paradox reveals contradictions in the phenomena of the surrounding reality. The novelty of the study seems to be that until now the language of modern poetry in this aspect has not been studied in linguistics.
Due to the increased relevance of the question of the paradox as an artistic device in postmodern aesthetics, its study within the framework of modern science is becoming more and more active. The attention of scientists is directed to the study of the nature of the paradox, its traditions in national literatures, the peculiarities of its functioning within various literary trends or in the work of specific authors. Science accumulates material for generalization on this issue: dissertation research, scientific conferences are devoted to the study of paradoxicity in the literature; articles are published in university scientific journals and separate collections on this topic. This process is going on actively and is far from finished, the fragmentation of the overall picture in the definition of the literary paradox is revealed.

Весь текст будет доступен после покупки

1. Антонова, О. Парадоксы в переводе: теория и практика// Москва: Издательство "Дрофа". 2018 – 164 C.
2. Баранова, Е. Парадоксы в переводе художественной литературы. //Санкт-Петербург: Издательство "Питер". – 2017 – 54 C.
3. Белоусова, Е.. Парадокс в переводе: особенности передачи в русском языке. //Москва: Издательство "Логос". – 2015 – 183 C.
4. Береснева А.В. Структурно-функциональные особенности парадоксальных высказываний в немецком языке - 2016 – 264 С.
5. Васильева, А. Особенности перевода парадоксов в русской поэзии. //Москва: Издательство "АСТ". – 2019 – 78 С.
6. Войнов Д.А. Креативность интернет-коммуникации как способ индивидуального политического участия граждан // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология - 2013 – 130 С.
7. Горбунова, О. Особенности перевода парадоксов в романах Оскара Уайльда. //Санкт-Петербург: Издательство "Алетейя". – 2018 – 57 С.
8. Григорьева, Е. Парадоксы в переводе: проблемы и перспективы. //Санкт-Петербург: Издательство "Нестор". – 2018 – 278 С.
9. Данилова, М. Парадоксы в переводе художественной прозы. //Москва: Издательство "Академический проект". – 2016 – 138 С.
10. Дмитриева, А. Парадоксы в русском переводе произведений Оскара Уайльда. //Москва: Издательство "Флинта". – 2016 – 95С.
11. Дружинин А.М. Управление смыслами в манипулятивных коммуникациях // Актуальные проблемы государственного управления, экономики, юриспруденции и психологии сборник научных трудов. Москва - 2015 – 136 С.
12. Егорова, В. Парадоксы в переводе: теория и практика. //Санкт-Петербург: Издательство "Алетейя". – 2017 - 254 С.

Весь текст будет доступен после покупки